Close

Complete Captcha

• 2 years - 325 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 2385 Goods vs 1901 No Goods

1. Economist
   ba51
   

   Stanford GSB

   2 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

2. Economist
   e601
   

   Stanford GSB is deteriorating very fast

   2 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   9efb
   

   Stanford GSB is deteriorating very fast

   Spiess is going there to become a minion to Athey and Imbens. Why else would he pick the Operations, Information & Technology group even when the Econ group doesn't want him. First Mullainathan now he needs new masters?

   2 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

4. Economist
   6e1d
   

   “How to get a job at Stanford”

   2 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

5. Economist
   2a29
   

   Athey also knows little about ML, together with Spiess they'll do great.

   2 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

6. Economist
   8d8d
   

   lol

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   b890
   

   Strategically omitting citations is a fad now?

   https://mobile.twitter.com/saskatchewin/status/1093195720092516356

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

8. Economist
   e8c5
   

   Strategically omitting citations is a fad now?
   https://twitter.com/saskatchewin/status/1093195720092516356

   I strategically omit citations so that I can figure out who my referees are/blockquote>

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

9. Economist
   e8c5
   

   I strategically omit citations so that I can figure out who my referees are

   Strategically omitting citations is a fad now?
   https://twitter.com/saskatchewin/status/1093195720092516356

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

10. Economist
    0658
    

    It's called a joke. Try developing a sense of humor.

    Strategically omitting citations is a fad now?
    https://mobile.twitter.com/saskatchewin/status/1093195720092516356

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 3 No Jab !

11. Economist
    9e5b
    

    I think Sarsons is actually mocking Spiess, subtly publicly.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 5 Jab 0 No Jab !

12. Economist
    febd
    

    Athey also knows little about ML, together with Spiess they'll do great.

    Depends. Is he a sexual being?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

13. Economist
    9004
    

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/business/economics-sexual-harassment-metoo.amp.html

    Susan Athey also knows little about ML, together with Spiess they'll do great.

    Depends. Is he a sexual being?

    Good one

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

14. Economist
    fcd0
    

    What if Susan's husband, an economist, had not considered her a sexual being

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/10/business/economics-sexual-harassment-metoo.html

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

15. Economist
    cbd1
    

    You guys gotta lay off on Sarsons. She's actually nice and not arrogant.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 1 No Jab !

16. Economist
    ba6b
    

    Lol @ all the "elite" econometrics groups that flew this clown out. And double lol @ Stanford GSB.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

17. Economist
    cbb2
    

    He is going because he is dating Blattner

    Stanford GSB is deteriorating very fast

    Spiess is going there to become a minion to Athey and Imbens. Why else would he pick the Operations, Information & Technology group even when the Econ group doesn't want him. First Mullainathan now he needs new masters?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

18. Economist
    82b5
    

    She had more options than him you idiot.

    He is going because he is dating Blattner

    Stanford GSB is deteriorating very fast

    Spiess is going there to become a minion to Athey and Imbens. Why else would he pick the Operations, Information & Technology group even when the Econ group doesn't want him. First Mullainathan now he needs new masters?
    

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

19. Economist
    cbb2
    

    I never said she didn't. I'm saying he followed her there.

    She had more options than him you idiot.

    He is going because he is dating Blattner

    Stanford GSB is deteriorating very fast

    Spiess is going there to become a minion to Athey and Imbens. Why else would he pick the Operations, Information & Technology group even when the Econ group doesn't want him. First Mullainathan now he needs new masters?
    

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

20. Economist
    89bf
    

    According to her she followed him and

    I never said she didn't. I'm saying he followed her there.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

Reply »