I am in an Asian University. My lawyers suggest me to sue the university and individuals. Universities never solve problems internally, always try their best to protect unethical ones. This is ironic. Shouldn't university be a place to educate kids ethics, integrity, honesty, and all other kinds of good merits? However, the university itself is completely lack of these.
Sydney University Finance toxic and corrupt
-
What’s the name of the baldy guy?
Who is the hard working European?Unfortunately there are only 2 decent people in their finance department. One is an arrogant baldy and the other is a hard-working European. The rest of the department belongs at pure teaching schools. Yet, the department as a whole is arrogant because the uni enjoys a good reputation Australia.
Nah - knock that count down to 1. The arrogant baldy was refused promotion to Level D despite 3 A* and two top 3 Finance, as well as winning the best teacher of the year award for the whole business school. The reason? Not enough 'Service'. A couple of candidates who did get promoted to Ass Prof had a grand total of 3 Economics Letters. Yep - 7,500 words of published research. I guess they knew how to provide a quality of 'service' to the Dean that the baldy simply wasnt able to.
-
Baldy is Sean Foley.
What happened to Jamie Alcock, GP and Doug Foster? They were fired or they left?
Either way, it tells us that USyd is ef-f-f-ing craeap.Who are these people? I have never read any of their work before. This suggests that it is possibly good riddance of a bunch of unproductive and toxic individuals. USyd will get stronger.
-
Baldy is Sean Foley.
What happened to Jamie Alcock, GP and Doug Foster? They were fired or they left?
Either way, it tells us that USyd is ef-f-f-ing craeap.Who are these people? I have never read any of their work before. This suggests that it is possibly good riddance of a bunch of unproductive and toxic individuals. USyd will get stronger.
Things are all relative, Yes VLRM's by US standards, but they are to the right of the bell curve at USYD. Anyone who can leave does. How do you think that will make USYD stronger? Maybe a stronger teaching school, otherwise, you are kidding yourself.
-
Baldy is Sean Foley.
What happened to Jamie Alcock, GP and Doug Foster? They were fired or they left?
Either way, it tells us that USyd is ef-f-f-ing craeap.
Who are these people? I have never read any of their work before. This suggests that it is possibly good riddance of a bunch of unproductive and toxic individuals. USyd will get stronger.Things are all relative, Yes VLRM's by US standards, but they are to the right of the bell curve at USYD. Anyone who can leave does. How do you think that will make USYD stronger? Maybe a stronger teaching school, otherwise, you are kidding yourself.
Andriy Shkilko was not a VLRM. He has JF//JFE//JFQA//MS and many more. The people leaving are those that can get jobs elsewhere. All this does is to hollow out the department, leaving 'senior' (read old) administrators who wouldnt know the difference between the JF and the WSJ.
-
Just checked Andriy Shkilko out. He is indeed a pretty decent vlrm but he has never been a faculty member of usyd. He seems to have spent his whole life in Canada. Perhaps the greatest fault of usyd is to have hired a bunch of dossers in the first place. Firing these dossers is coming back to bite them.
-
Just checked Andriy Shkilko out. He is indeed a pretty decent vlrm but he has never been a faculty member of usyd. He seems to have spent his whole life in Canada. Perhaps the greatest fault of usyd is to have hired a bunch of dossers in the first place. Firing these dossers is coming back to bite them.
He was hired at 40% 2018-2020. His skills were deemed 'too good' for USYD and so contract was not extended.
-
too good? that says it all about the standard for which usyd is aiming
They were looking for a professor with a stronger 'administration' focus.
Anybody competent is a perceived threat to a weak entrenched management team. Thus, talent is overlooked for employment or existing talent face unnecessary obstacles imposed by management to stifle their career and eventually leave such a toxic environment on bad terms.
Look at the long list of people who have recently left. They either have leadership traits or are USyd's best researchers.
3 of the 4 staff that expressed an interest in being the Head of Discipline but were not given the position have subsequently left on bad terms. Management ask for expressions of interest for these positions just as a ploy to identify any new potential threats. Put your hand up for them and you wont get them - just become the next target.
-
too good? that says it all about the standard for which usyd is aiming
They were looking for a professor with a stronger 'administration' focus.
Anybody competent is a perceived threat to a weak entrenched management team. Thus, talent is overlooked for employment or existing talent face unnecessary obstacles imposed by management to stifle their career and eventually leave such a toxic environment on bad terms.
Look at the long list of people who have recently left. They either have leadership traits or are USyd's best researchers.
3 of the 4 staff that expressed an interest in being the Head of Discipline but were not given the position have subsequently left on bad terms. Management ask for expressions of interest for these positions just as a ploy to identify any new potential threats. Put your hand up for them and you wont get them - just become the next target.Where did Jamie Alcock, GP and Doug Foster go? GP retired or forced to retire early? Surely, DF and JA are too young to retire?
-
too good? that says it all about the standard for which usyd is aiming
They were looking for a professor with a stronger 'administration' focus.
Anybody competent is a perceived threat to a weak entrenched management team. Thus, talent is overlooked for employment or existing talent face unnecessary obstacles imposed by management to stifle their career and eventually leave such a toxic environment on bad terms.
Look at the long list of people who have recently left. They either have leadership traits or are USyd's best researchers.
3 of the 4 staff that expressed an interest in being the Head of Discipline but were not given the position have subsequently left on bad terms. Management ask for expressions of interest for these positions just as a ploy to identify any new potential threats. Put your hand up for them and you wont get them - just become the next target.Where did Jamie Alcock, GP and Doug Foster go? GP retired or forced to retire early? Surely, DF and JA are too young to retire?
GP -> forced to retire
JA and DF -> left voluntarily