Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.
Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
I am intolerant towards people who thinks and says horrible things. Cry me a river...
Incels GTFO. You disgust me. Crawl back to your degenerate forums.
Thank
-actual economistI feel pity for you. If you were born in Germany in the early 1900 you would have been on the wrong side
Luckily we are in 2019
But you are still intolerant to the core
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here bro
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
- involuntarily celibate guy
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
I am intolerant towards people who thinks and says horrible things. Cry me a river...
To think and say things you say are "horrible" is allowed. More importantly, it does not necessarily mean that the person saying those things is "misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels".
The fact that you jump to these conclusions and spout insults only reveals that you are not willing to even engage with ideas different than yours. Thats kind of illiberal.
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
- involuntarily celibate guy
The fact that you jump to these conclusions and spout insults only reveals that you are not willing to even engage with ideas different than yours. Thats kind of illiberal.
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here broI don't want any points. I would like mods to remove this kind of dumb discussions, but it is too much to ask. I am also happily married...
How liberal of you to ask that opinion different than yours be censored
Yes, I'm intolerant toward misogynistic, homophobic, racist, rape-apologist, and (not so subtly) pedo incels. I just hope you are all simply dumb immature teenagers.
Well you confirm my point. You are intolerant towards people who thinks and says different things from you.
- involuntarily celibate guy
The fact that you jump to these conclusions and spout insults only reveals that you are not willing to even engage with ideas different than yours. Thats kind of illiberal.
- involuntarily celibate guy
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here broI don't want any points. I would like mods to remove this kind of dumb discussions, but it is too much to ask. I am also happily married...
How liberal of you to ask that opinion different than yours be censored
- involuntarily celibate guy
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here broI don't want any points. I would like mods to remove this kind of dumb discussions, but it is too much to ask. I am also happily married...
How liberal of you to ask that opinion different than yours be censored
This is EJMR. There are plenty of outlets for you to discuss this stuff.
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here bro
I don't want any points. I would like mods to remove this kind of dumb discussions, but it is too much to ask. I am also happily married...
How liberal of you to ask that opinion different than yours be censored
This is EJMR. There are plenty of outlets for you to discuss this stuff.
You should have started with this rather than the insults.
Page views are up. Kirk doesn't care that they are from this type of thread.
White knighting isn't going to score you any points here broI don't want any points. I would like mods to remove this kind of dumb discussions, but it is too much to ask. I am also happily married...
please tell me that the person who spent half an hour doing this "research" is not an academic economist
uns out, she did a sub sub sub part of a programm. A sort of 'adaptor' that just reformats certain data into another format, and then feeds it into the ACTUAL programm.
That misrepresentation of what she actually contributed and what she actually did is nauseing.
Sources :
here, what SHE wrote ( HOPSTOOLS ) :
https://github.com/klbouman/hopstools
Here the mother program, where that optional part of her is added, where it acts as a sort of interface to import one more datatype by reformatting it.
source :
https://github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors
btw: that's also NOT an algo, but just reformatting data. You dont understand - she did NOT write and algo at all. sche did NOT write an image tool at all.
What she did code is at max about 4 pages of code - but more importantly - is neither an algo, nor a imaging program
but is an ADAPTOR for a source of data, which reformats the data to feed it into the mother program - of which she contributed that adaptor, which makes up ca 0.01% of said mother program at max AND is marked as "optional" part of the program
sources :
https://github.com/sao-eht/eat/graphs/contributors
---
Her whole bundle ("hopstools") here was merged into the mother programm and counted as one commit of 'mother' program.
hopstools, of which she did at max 25%
Her share on contribution on this actual imaging program is about 0.3% max, but OK lets say 1% -
So she did less than 1/4 of 1% of the work. max. If we're very generous.
And again : HOPSTOOLS is just an adaptor for another dataformat that can be read into the 'mother' programm. that's it.