Close

Complete Captcha

• 8 years - 11 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 31 Goods vs 23 No Goods

1. Economist
   a165
   

   We are specifically looking at top 20-40 candidates this year as we have decided to strengthen our position in a quite narrow field that is usually ignored by top-10 schools. We have already reviewed some applications, and there are some potentially strong candidates. See you in Boston!

   8 years ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 13 Vlad !

2. Economist
   bc0d
   

   fck off

   8 years ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 3 Vlad !

3. Economist
   a927
   

   Why only candidates from top 20-40? I am from LRM, but with 2 R&Rs and an interesting pipeline.

   8 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 3 Vlad !

4. Economist
   bc0d
   

   op is an asshole grad student pulling your leg

   8 years ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   7c26
   

   Name the field or it didn't happen.

   Also there are 15 depts outside of the sacred zipcode claiming to be top 10.

   8 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !

6. Economist
   9a9d
   

   What field OP, bad internet trolling?

   8 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   a165
   

   op is an asshole grad student pulling your leg

   OK I guess it was too obvious :(

   8 years ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 2 Vlad !

8. Economist
   7aae
   

   Yep. You're clueless about how it works. See you getting screwed on the market when you grow up!

   op is an asshole grad student pulling your leg

   OK I guess it was too obvious :(

   8 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   1cca
   

   Toronto is not top 10.

   8 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    acf3
    

    Marxist feminist economics would be a field that is undervalued by top 10, I suppose. But then again, which T20-40 would have it?

    8 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    87f9
    

    This thread proves that Harvard and MIT suck this year.

    8 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.