Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 147 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 1363 Goods vs 159 No Goods

1. Economist
   5230
   

   I need to be more diligent, but it's frustrating to see suggestions that I'm insensitive to issues of inclusion and diversity.

   This is Wooldridge cancelling himself by giving in to the wokes. He shouldn't be saying he should be more diligent! He shouldn't give in to the mob because he was on an all-male panel.

   Exactly. He did all these to himself. He seems to be really naive. Just came out of his cave and did not know what's going on in the world. He should have never respond this: https://mobile.twitter.com/jmwooldridge/status/1452712225815384065

   1 year ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   447c
   

   I need to be more diligent, but it's frustrating to see suggestions that I'm insensitive to issues of inclusion and diversity.

   This is Wooldridge cancelling himself by giving in to the wokes. He shouldn't be saying he should be more diligent! He shouldn't give in to the mob because he was on an all-male panel.

   He is a woke f/o/o/l

   1 year ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   9582
   

   I need to be more diligent, but it's frustrating to see suggestions that I'm insensitive to issues of inclusion and diversity.

   This is Wooldridge cancelling himself by giving in to the wokes. He shouldn't be saying he should be more diligent! He shouldn't give in to the mob because he was on an all-male panel.

   Exactly. He did all these to himself. He seems to be really naive. Just came out of his cave and did not know what's going on in the world. He should have never respond this: https://mobile.twitter.com/jmwooldridge/status/1452712225815384065

   He was certainly naive, but you can see why. Here he's supervised a bunch of women in econometrics and he also taught in the AEA program for minorities. You can see why he wouldn't think of himself as a target. Twitter is fun until it isn't.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 24 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   5230
   

   I need to be more diligent, but it's frustrating to see suggestions that I'm insensitive to issues of inclusion and diversity.

   This is Wooldridge cancelling himself by giving in to the wokes. He shouldn't be saying he should be more diligent! He shouldn't give in to the mob because he was on an all-male panel.

   He is a woke f/o/o/l

   Good. Then he deserves this.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 3 Vlad !

5. Economist
   e639
   

   I know Jeff. He's one of the good ones. This outrage directed at him tonight is beyond misplaced and reflects very poorly on the intelligence and professionalism of those lobbing baseless accusations in his direction.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 23 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   447c
   

   I love it when wokes cancel each other. Good riddance to all of them.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   f9ad
   

   https://mobile.twitter.com/econjobrumors/status/1453199384389185544

   1 year ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   447c
   

   Doleac literally only promotes female JMCs

   1 year ago # QUOTE 22 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   e64e
   

   He should have seen this coming. Doesn't matter how many times he sides with the w/o/k/e/s. One 'mistake' in their eyes, and they think you are the coming of the antiChrist.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    5230
    

    I love it when wokes cancel each other. Good riddance to all of them.

    It's common in the Culture Revolution. Small commies eat old commies. After finishing right wingers, eventually commies eat each other for fun. It's called purge.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 25 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    447c
    

    Here is Zoe McLaren\'s publication record: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=t6ZtGJwAAAAJ&hl=en I suspect that the only way she got tenure with that pile of s/h/i/t is her g/e/n/d/e/r and woke advocacy.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 8 Vlad !

12. Economist
    ee1e
    

    10 years ago I thought it was crazy to think having women in academia would be a bad thing
    Now I realize they singlehandedly destroyed it by making everything about emotion/fairness and not about seeking truth

    This is misplaced. First, the problem is not Academia, but Twitter. 99% of people who tweet the most have zero impact in real world academia. Second, this argument would imply that race only became a thing because there are too many non-white people in academia, which is not true. It is always the same group of people --- whoever they may be --- manifesting religious fundamentalism in social issues.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 15 Vlad !

13. Economist
    4d7f
    

    10 years ago I thought it was crazy to think having women in academia would be a bad thing
    Now I realize they singlehandedly destroyed it by making everything about emotion/fairness and not about seeking truth

    This is misplaced. First, the problem is not Academia, but Twitter. 99% of people who tweet the most have zero impact in real world academia. Second, this argument would imply that race only became a thing because there are too many non-white people in academia, which is not true. It is always the same group of people --- whoever they may be --- manifesting religious fundamentalism in social issues.

    MSU's VP of research Steve Hsu was attacked on Twitter.

    He lost his job within a month.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 15 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    9e0a
    

    10 years ago I thought it was crazy to think having women in academia would be a bad thing
    Now I realize they singlehandedly destroyed it by making everything about emotion/fairness and not about seeking truth

    This is misplaced. First, the problem is not Academia, but Twitter. 99% of people who tweet the most have zero impact in real world academia. Second, this argument would imply that race only became a thing because there are too many non-white people in academia, which is not true. It is always the same group of people --- whoever they may be --- manifesting religious fundamentalism in social issues.

    Race became a thing because of women allies, the Coalition of the Officially Oppressed.

    If you cannot see the gender undertones of these development, you’re ngmi as a social scientist:

    1. Poll after poll shows women care much less for freedom of speech, due process and other “white male” principles.

    2. Women don’t like to or cannot function well, relatively, in hierarchies:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessness

    Is there a precedent of a large woman-dominated institution that ran effectively, in the entire history of mankind?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 19 Volod 3 Vlad !

15. Economist
    f9ad
    

    Here is Zoe McLaren\'s publication record: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=t6ZtGJwAAAAJ&hl=en I suspect that the only way she got tenure with that pile of s/h/i/t is her g/e/n/d/e/r and woke advocacy.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/econjobrumors/status/1453206040388902919

    1 year ago # QUOTE 8 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    b37d
    

    Here is Zoe McLaren\'s publication record: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=t6ZtGJwAAAAJ&hl=en I suspect that the only way she got tenure with that pile of s/h/i/t is her g/e/n/d/e/r and woke advocacy.

    I mean she does have a Restat

    1 year ago # QUOTE 7 Volod 6 Vlad !

17. Economist
    4351
    

    Making a mistake that was insensitive or non-inclusive doesn't mean that you are defined as being insensitive or non-inclusive. It sucks to be called out, but just apologize, learn from it, and do better next time.
    @TrishaShrum
    LOL @ this nobody giving a lecture to Wooldridge. Absolute cringe.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    4351
    

    “working to solve climate change” lol
    @TrishaShrum
    LOL @ this nobody giving a lecture to Wooldridge. Absolute cringe.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    ee1e
    

    I suggest you never combine "polls" and "social scientist" in the same argument - it makes one look silly.

    10 years ago I thought it was crazy to think having women in academia would be a bad thing
    Now I realize they singlehandedly destroyed it by making everything about emotion/fairness and not about seeking truth

    This is misplaced. First, the problem is not Academia, but Twitter. 99% of people who tweet the most have zero impact in real world academia. Second, this argument would imply that race only became a thing because there are too many non-white people in academia, which is not true. It is always the same group of people --- whoever they may be --- manifesting religious fundamentalism in social issues.

    Race became a thing because of women allies, the Coalition of the Officially Oppressed.
    If you cannot see the gender undertones of these development, you’re ngmi as a social scientist:
    1. Poll after poll shows women care much less for freedom of speech, due process and other “white male” principles.
    2. Women don’t like to or cannot function well, relatively, in hierarchies:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessness
    Is there a precedent of a large woman-dominated institution that ran effectively, in the entire history of mankind?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 10 Vlad !

20. Economist
    9e0a
    

    ^ ok surveys or whatever you choose: there is a fundamental difference in attitudes towards those “white make” principles, between men and women, that my grandmother’s grandmother knew, and the latest psychologists and social scientists also know.

    Never nitpick, you give away that you’re midwit coward who dodges tough questions with word games.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 17 Volod 3 Vlad !

Reply »