Lol at white guy who thinks he can outshoot MS-13looks like civil war 2 will happen sooner than expected. luckily the right side will win :D
UC is already filtering out applicants with a low-scoring diversity statement!
-
This inceeelll dated two models and women from five different countries. Thanks for making an assumption. I hope you do join one of the UC universities and find solace in that crazy environment.
^ One wrong comment to a crazy female or an undergrad, and your career might end like that.
- involuntarily celibate guy
-
This inceeelll dated two models and women from five different countries. Thanks for making an assumption. I hope you do join one of the UC universities and find solace in that crazy environment.
^ One wrong comment to a crazy female or an undergrad, and your career might end like that.
- involuntarily celibate guy
- involuntarily celibate guy pretending to be chad
-
It is happening at UCD and UCLA this year too. If you applied to a UC and were rejected, you have a potential lawsuit. Looks like they're looking for volunteers: https://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2020/01/have-you-been-rejected-in-a-search-requiring-a-mandatory-diversity-statement.html
-
If you want quality scientists who are able to do good honest scientific work, then its probably best not to explicitly seek out careerists who are willing to lie and play beuracratic games, and explicitly filter out honest people who aren't prepared to "write what is wanted".You misunderstand a couple of points. The first is that quality applicants are strong enough to be able to write what is wanted by administrators in these statements. .
The sort of people who "write what is wanted" by administrators to further their career are the _exact_ sort of people who are going to p-hack and manipulate data in papers in order to further their career. The system is explictly filtering for liars and charlatans, and discriminating against honest people.
-
Let me get this straight: you want to get a life-long paycheck from the state, funded by the tax dollars of a diverse citizenry, but you're mad at having to write out a statement discussing how you'll approach the task of teaching and interacting with your diverse employers?
Oh, the horror.
-
Let me get this straight: you want to get a life-long paycheck from the state, funded by the tax dollars of a diverse citizenry, but you're mad at having to write out a statement discussing how you'll approach the task of teaching and interacting with your diverse employers?
Oh, the horror.They don't want to know if you are capable of teaching different people. They want to know if you agree with or submit to wokeness.
-
Let me get this straight: you want to get a life-long paycheck from the state, funded by the tax dollars of a diverse citizenry, but you're mad at having to write out a statement discussing how you'll approach the task of teaching and interacting with your diverse employers?
Oh, the horror.That's not what diversity statements are for and you know it.
-
You misunderstand a couple of points. The first is that quality applicants are strong enough to be able to write what is wanted by administrators in these statements. .
If you want quality scientists who are able to do good honest scientific work, then its probably best not to explicitly seek out careerists who are willing to lie and play beuracratic games, and explicitly filter out honest people who aren't prepared to "write what is wanted".
The sort of people who "write what is wanted" by administrators to further their career are the _exact_ sort of people who are going to p-hack and manipulate data in papers in order to further their career. The system is explictly filtering for liars and charlatans, and discriminating against honest people.This. We should have a system that promotes scrupulous honesty, not double-talk.
-
LOL at 'Murica! There would be more to say if there was anyway to push back against this insane diversity cult. But there isn't. This is the future you created.
This was the reason (when I was on the market) that I never applied anywhere in California. But soon, it will be like this everywhere else.
You're screwed. No other way to put it.
-
UC is a crazy school; it’s too dangerous a time to be employee there. One false #metoo and you are done. There will be no due process.
Can I just point out that this guy seems to think UC is a single school? What breed of high school dropout are we dealing with here exactly?