Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist fd82
Why Ng?
Economist 9be6
Current w0ke APSR team, hands down.
Economist 54ed
bump
Economist 20f7
Johannes Horner, Debraj Ray not sure which one is worse, no decisions for years or decisions wildly biased in favor of buddies
Economist de36
Vincent Crawford, David Levine
Economist ef20
Thomas J. Sargent, 7 months rejection with 0 comments (de facto a 7 months desk rejection)
Economist 0cf4
agrawal at world development was horrendous
Economist 18a5
Why Levine?
Economist 0c07
Richard Holden
Economist 5d0d
Here's a list: Piazzesi at JPE Uhlig at JPE and ECMA Shimer at JPE Reis at JME King at JME Of those, I think Uhlig is the worst.
These are some of the all time worst. Add Misters Corrupt Costas Meghir and his sidekick Luigi Pistaferri.
Post <blockquote>Most editors agree with the negative referees when they reject even if they try their best to make it sound otherwise - they are just trying to ease the pain for you, and it's actually always sad to reject a paper ... yet what can you do? c'est la vie. <blockquote><blockquote>Rather than name names, let me just say this. The worst editor is the one who doesn't have the ba!!s to triage the referees' comments and make his or her own decision about the paper. </blockquote> Almost every editor is like that. </blockquote></blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li