Close

Complete Captcha

• 6 months - 94 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 370 Goods vs 57 No Goods

1. Economist
   2f73
   

   I think it was ignored because there's no real reason to think this is Ken Judd (or am I missing some verification?).
   There's some germs of truth here, but this is silly:

   Many people my age have stopped doing serious research in favor of consulting because they are unhappy with the current situation with journals and academics in general.

   The reason people do consulting while being a professor is to pull down enormous HRM salaries while having full time second jobs that also pay exorbitantly...

   Yes, Ken Judd posts here. I like to see the reactions. When I talk to professors, they say nothing, which is probably a rational decision. How can I verify my posts?

   OK, its not Judd. Prof. Judd doesn't speak or write this way. He's a lot blunter and more direct than this.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   db8b
   

   It's hard to take a lot of you srsly on these matters because most of you are giant lemons. And then there are the undergrads obsessed with faang salaries who have trouble understanding basic concepts in research and are only good at following orders from their product managers. I think it's time some of you join another forum.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

3. Economist
   bd88
   

   It's hard to take a lot of you srsly on these matters because most of you are giant lemons. And then there are the undergrads obsessed with faang salaries who have trouble understanding basic concepts in research and are only good at following orders from their product managers. I think it's time some of you join another forum.

   You are still a dvvmb parasite.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   2f73
   

   Ken Judd is a lightweight. Who cares about this guy?

   Funny, light is not a word I would pick when referencing him. It doesn't sound like you know who we are talking about.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   db8b
   

   you're a lemon.

   It's hard to take a lot of you srsly on these matters because most of you are giant lemons. And then there are the undergrads obsessed with faang salaries who have trouble understanding basic concepts in research and are only good at following orders from their product managers. I think it's time some of you join another forum.

   You are still a dvvmb parasite.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   4b6d
   

   From Ken's website: https://showmethemath.org/2022/01/my-advice-to-new-phds-on-the-job-market/

   5 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   1d74
   

   Based

   5 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   1f77
   

   Bump this man to the 100 good club. He is one of the few HRM willing to openly call out the many failings of academic Economics.

   5 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   270e
   

   Thank you sir you are my hero in this profession

   5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    5d6f
    

    What I took away from Judd's post is that after six negative referee reports, Heckman still accepted the paper by intervening personally. Have you had that courtesy done to you for any of your submissions.Not I (many times I have got rejects even after two marginally positive reports for many submissions). You folks seem to have overlooked this minor point.

    I don't think another pub matters for Judd's future any longer, any everyone in the profession knows anyway by now that he is an author on that paper, so that's that.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    6197
    

    I’ve been in this game, it’s made me an animal, theres rules to this shit, I wrote me a manual. A step by step booklet for you to get, your game on track, not your wig pushed back.

    What I took away from Judd's post is that after six negative referee reports, Heckman still accepted the paper by intervening personally. Have you had that courtesy done to you for any of your submissions.Not I (many times I have got rejects even after two marginally positive reports for many submissions). You folks seem to have overlooked this minor point.
    I don't think another pub matters for Judd's future any longer, any everyone in the profession knows anyway by now that he is an author on that paper, so that's that.

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    674f
    

    Ken,

    what do you think led to the declining intellectual standards of academia? It is really disheartening to see, can it be reversed?

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    1d74
    

    bump for the JMC

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    008d
    

    I’ve been in this game, it’s made me an animal, theres rules to this shit, I wrote me a manual. A step by step booklet for you to get, your game on track, not your wig pushed back.

    What I took away from Judd's post is that after six negative referee reports, Heckman still accepted the paper by intervening personally. Have you had that courtesy done to you for any of your submissions.Not I (many times I have got rejects even after two marginally positive reports for many submissions). You folks seem to have overlooked this minor point.
    I don't think another pub matters for Judd's future any longer, any everyone in the profession knows anyway by now that he is an author on that paper, so that's that.
    

    Could you elaborate? Did you do things out of character? And are the top researchers systemically morally depraved?

    5 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.