Warwick has Clement Imbert, a rising star.
He does not do Macro, Finance, Int. Macro, which is what the OP asked about, so who cares?
Warwick vs. UVA for Ph.D. (field: Macro, Finance, Int. Macro)
-
Silly argument. There is a huge cost for a European in moving to the US. That's why most Europeans would not move to the US except for a top 15 PhD.
This made my day, lol. Choosing Cambridge over Georgetown, Rutgers, or Notre Dame is just hilarious. Over Oregon sounds right though.
Definitely UVA. And I say that as having been to Warwick.
Why? what was your experience? Many people hold Warwick in a similar regard as Cambridge and, honestly, anybody would prefer to go to Cambridge than to Universities like Georgetown, Oregon, Rutgers and Notredame that as per the answer above seem to be better than Warwick.
I thought Warwick would be as good as a top 30-40 to be honest. Unfortunately, I have no insider info whatsoever.
Yeah? go to Europe my american-centrist friend. Then ask around where would they study...
Most would not come to the US unless is a top 20 university and most would be willing to study at Cambridge econ. Do the math.
Of course if you lived all your life in DC or somewhere in Indiana and don't want to go to Europe unless it's for LSE you would take GU or ND. But the observation was general, not just for people in the US.