Because finance is a sub field of Econ, and publishing top field journals won’t cut it at top departments.
why does she need a top 5 for a finance dept?
She doesn’t have a single Top5 and still got tenure at booth…
WD to Columbia Business
-
^Does she have any single authored paper?
It is possible that Booth will be able to give the Fischer Black prize like the Sloan, in order to justify the decision. But the takeaway from most of the profession will be more about the integrity of the prize and clout as opposed to inherent quality. People can look at past winners and compare themselves, and it won't look good.
-
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
-
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
Yeah this will happen. APs at our HRM have started questioning the DEI practices openly
-
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
The sounds fair. But the scholar in question is not low quality.
-
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
The sounds fair. But the scholar in question is not low quality.
Per usual, people here just look at pub count and don’t understand impact and attribute her tenure over other Chicago juniors as a sign of DEI. She’s done more to define an important field than any of the Chicago juniors ever will despite others having large numbers of publications. The Chicago juniors barely have to teach and have unlimited resources at their disposal, so anything less than an A per year would be massive underperforming. MW on pricing frictions, his advisor YG has already done that, Chicago should hire Yuri. SH writes the Nth cheap shot against market efficiency, with his tenured advisor DS that was already passed on by top schools. CY, does he even know what’s in his papers?
-
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
The sounds fair. But the scholar in question is not low quality.
Per usual, people here just look at pub count and don’t understand impact and attribute her tenure over other Chicago juniors as a sign of DEI. She’s done more to define an important field than any of the Chicago juniors ever will despite others having large numbers of publications. The Chicago juniors barely have to teach and have unlimited resources at their disposal, so anything less than an A per year would be massive underperforming. MW on pricing frictions, his advisor YG has already done that, Chicago should hire Yuri. SH writes the Nth cheap shot against market efficiency, with his tenured advisor DS that was already passed on by top schools. CY, does he even know what’s in his papers?
I’ll also add that you’re not just judged by your best work but by your worst, and oh man, do those other Chicago juniors have some stupid papers, even ones published in top journals.
-
Are you guys aware that her paper with Verdelhan has been shown wrong? That was the defining paper of the "agenda" she "revived"
DEI not only back fires against women, given that everybody understands that some scholars are getting way higher position and recognition that is objectively deserved by their contributions exclusively because they are women, but also against the senior white men in the profession. I’ve been listening to dozens of young male researchers in finance who have started to complain vocally about the attitude of their male seniors, who have nothing to lose and are willing to kill young promising people’s cases to instead foster several objectively worse profiles. Younger scholars’ morale is very low and I fear that we will observe a strong push back over the next 2-3 years, especially if SCOTUS states that favoring URMs in college admissions is unconstitutional. This would be the justification for many younger people to revolt to the DEI-inspired decisions of their seniors
The sounds fair. But the scholar in question is not low quality.
Per usual, people here just look at pub count and don’t understand impact and attribute her tenure over other Chicago juniors as a sign of DEI. She’s done more to define an important field than any of the Chicago juniors ever will despite others having large numbers of publications. The Chicago juniors barely have to teach and have unlimited resources at their disposal, so anything less than an A per year would be massive underperforming. MW on pricing frictions, his advisor YG has already done that, Chicago should hire Yuri. SH writes the Nth cheap shot against market efficiency, with his tenured advisor DS that was already passed on by top schools. CY, does he even know what’s in his papers?
-
WD’s coauthors we’re doing that before her. If it is such an important field that WD “defined”, why is her citations magnitudes smaller than MW’s? Not saying others are better, but she is below tenure bar and Sloan.
Per usual, people here just look at pub count and don’t understand impact and attribute her tenure over other Chicago juniors as a sign of DEI. She’s done more to define an important field than any of the Chicago juniors ever will despite others having large numbers of publications. The Chicago juniors barely have to teach and have unlimited resources at their disposal, so anything less than an A per year would be massive underperforming. MW on pricing frictions, his advisor YG has already done that, Chicago should hire Yuri. SH writes the Nth cheap shot against market efficiency, with his tenured advisor DS that was already passed on by top schools. CY, does he even know what’s in his papers?
-
MW's most cited work is on Covid employment. So novel that a million other people had the same thought and wrote the same paper at the same time.
WD’s coauthors we’re doing that before her. If it is such an important field that WD “defined”, why is her citations magnitudes smaller than MW’s? Not saying others are better, but she is below tenure bar and Sloan.
Per usual, people here just look at pub count and don’t understand impact and attribute her tenure over other Chicago juniors as a sign of DEI. She’s done more to define an important field than any of the Chicago juniors ever will despite others having large numbers of publications. The Chicago juniors barely have to teach and have unlimited resources at their disposal, so anything less than an A per year would be massive underperforming. MW on pricing frictions, his advisor YG has already done that, Chicago should hire Yuri. SH writes the Nth cheap shot against market efficiency, with his tenured advisor DS that was already passed on by top schools. CY, does he even know what’s in his papers?