they settle for saddle sniffers who've been around them for ages waiting for it to happen
What will the 30+ yo unmarried millennial women do in the coming years
-
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
-
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.Basically yeah. These women will never go back to the men who are their equals. They will just stay single and go to a sperm bank, having one kid
-
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
Why toil in misery? Men would not have to be providers in this hypothetical. Wouldn’t this raise leisure for men?
-
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
Why toil in misery? Men would not have to be providers in this hypothetical. Wouldn’t this raise leisure for men?
No hope of s3x or a family. I have friends like this. They will prob svicide within 10 years.
-
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.This. OP is a single male hoping millenial women who have rejected him all these years will come to regret their choices in their 30s. And he is hoping they will regret because he will find a good job and will make a lot of money. It is honestly the same pathetic scenario that a lot of ugly academically inclined men play in their heads. I hate to break it to you OP, but your $1xx,xxx job will not move the needle one bit. Unless you make significantly more (i.e. C-Suite level salary at a Fortunte 500 company) women will not evaluate you based on your earnings. They will see you for who you are, someone undesirable from an evolutionary perspective. A man who is not really successful, definitely not a leader, and doeesnt have a circle of friends that support him.
-
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.This will produce a societal equilibrium that will ultimately lead to the destruction of the country in a generational context.
-
Big picture, since we’re all scientists here, most men never reproduced throughout history. They were used as sl@ves or soldiers and k!lled early. We have something like 90% less diverse Y chromosomes compared to X.
Monogamous marriage was invented to stabilize agricultural society, so that all farmers had social support and child labor. Now, that model is broken and we’re reverting back to our prehistoric ways. Most men won’t do well.
-
This will be disastrous if true. The children of single mothers are more likely to be basket cases and/or cr1minals. Just look at what happened to inner cities after the dissolution of the blck family in the 1970s. This societal rot will infect poor and middle class whyte communities as well. The children of rich single women will be socially awkward and lack emotional control. Meanwhile, without the prospect of romance or family life, many men will partially disengage from the labor market (reducing aggregate productivity) and either become never-do-wells or get lost in the cyber realm. Many of those that don't get lost in cyberspace will still be resentful and angry. Demagogues will take advantage of the situation to "give these men a purpose" in pursuit of revolutionary causes. If unchecked these trends will lead to national ruin. Healthy gender relations are a fundamental building block of society. That is why many nations historically placed checks on pr0miscuity to ensure domestic stability.
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery. -
I agree -- especially with your last point on the danger created by armies of angry single males. But modern dating culture and tinder have created a serious problem.
This will be disastrous if true. The children of single mothers are more likely to be basket cases and/or cr1minals. Just look at what happened to inner cities after the dissolution of the blck family in the 1970s. This societal rot will infect poor and middle class whyte communities as well. The children of rich single women will be socially awkward and lack emotional control. Meanwhile, without the prospect of romance or family life, many men will partially disengage from the labor market (reducing aggregate productivity) and either become never-do-wells or get lost in the cyber realm. Many of those that don't get lost in cyberspace will still be resentful and angry. Demagogues will take advantage of the situation to "give these men a purpose" in pursuit of revolutionary causes. If unchecked these trends will lead to national ruin. Healthy gender relations are a fundamental building block of society. That is why many nations historically placed checks on pr0miscuity to ensure domestic stability.
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
-
This will be disastrous if true. The children of single mothers are more likely to be basket cases and/or cr1minals. Just look at what happened to inner cities after the dissolution of the blck family in the 1970s. This societal rot will infect poor and middle class whyte communities as well. The children of rich single women will be socially awkward and lack emotional control. Meanwhile, without the prospect of romance or family life, many men will partially disengage from the labor market (reducing aggregate productivity) and either become never-do-wells or get lost in the cyber realm. Many of those that don't get lost in cyberspace will still be resentful and angry. Demagogues will take advantage of the situation to "give these men a purpose" in pursuit of revolutionary causes. If unchecked these trends will lead to national ruin. Healthy gender relations are a fundamental building block of society. That is why many nations historically placed checks on pr0miscuity to ensure domestic stability.
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
Interesting analysis. You must be a mid age guy
-
This will be disastrous if true. The children of single mothers are more likely to be basket cases and/or cr1minals. Just look at what happened to inner cities after the dissolution of the blck family in the 1970s. This societal rot will infect poor and middle class whyte communities as well. The children of rich single women will be socially awkward and lack emotional control. Meanwhile, without the prospect of romance or family life, many men will partially disengage from the labor market (reducing aggregate productivity) and either become never-do-wells or get lost in the cyber realm. Many of those that don't get lost in cyberspace will still be resentful and angry. Demagogues will take advantage of the situation to "give these men a purpose" in pursuit of revolutionary causes. If unchecked these trends will lead to national ruin. Healthy gender relations are a fundamental building block of society. That is why many nations historically placed checks on pr0miscuity to ensure domestic stability.
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.
Interesting analysis. You must be a mid age guy
He's not wrong, the role of father figure especially in early child stage development is pivotal. You can look at the early developmental literature. You take that out of the picture and those offspring will eventually become the leaders. Once this fad takes hold, it will end in ruin.
-
This. OP is a single male hoping millenial women who have rejected him all these years will come to regret their choices in their 30s. And he is hoping they will regret because he will find a good job and will make a lot of money. It is honestly the same pathetic scenario that a lot of ugly academically inclined men play in their heads. I hate to break it to you OP, but your $1xx,xxx job will not move the needle one bit. Unless you make significantly more (i.e. C-Suite level salary at a Fortunte 500 company) women will not evaluate you based on your earnings. They will see you for who you are, someone undesirable from an evolutionary perspective. A man who is not really successful, definitely not a leader, and doeesnt have a circle of friends that support him.
Not OP, and I don't entertain any such hopes. I give up on living here and only aspire to move to China.
-
they will have to compete with 18-25 yo gen Z girls for the small fraction of eligible 30 yo male bachelors with solid careers
what will the consequences of this demographic trend be?It's pretty simple --millennial women are perfectly comfortable being single mothers to sperm-bank babies. They won't mind one bit being the sole parent, and they'll get to be selective of the genes that will lead to their children.
I think op is a single male who is hoping that such women who rejected him will somehow come to regret their choices. Spoiler: they won't! The future will have armies of unpartnered men who will toil in misery.Most realistic take ever.
For 1000s of years, women relied on men just to survive. The bond was broken in the 1960s and we're seeing the consequences.
They don't need men anymore; and due to VR and constant videos of their fav celebrity crushes, their brain tricks them to thinking they are dating them/or can date them. They rather wait for a Mr.Perfect or raise a child as a single mother nowadays.