Read Noah’s comment about Marshall. He likes Marshall’s obnoxious behavior bc he looks good by comparison which I pointed out yesterday regarding Dubes silence on Marshall’s behavior.
https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/1115727099451531264?s=21
yeah Noah likes to stan for Marshall for some reason. really degrades my opinion of Noah
Read Noah’s comment about Marshall. He likes Marshall’s obnoxious behavior bc he looks good by comparison which I pointed out yesterday regarding Dubes silence on Marshall’s behavior.
https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/1115727099451531264?s=21yeah Noah likes to stan for Marshall for some reason. really degrades my opinion of Noah
*That's* what degrades your opinion? Take Marshall out and I still roll my eyes at Noah.
Read Noah’s comment about Marshall. He likes Marshall’s obnoxious behavior bc he looks good by comparison which I pointed out yesterday regarding Dubes silence on Marshall’s behavior.
https://twitter.com/noahpinion/status/1115727099451531264?s=21yeah Noah likes to stan for Marshall for some reason. really degrades my opinion of Noah
*That's* what degrades your opinion? Take Marshall out and I still roll my eyes at Noah.
it's icing on the cake
^ His methodology is pretty terrible and he clearly is interested in a particular conclusion.
On the other hand, you could say that mainstream structural IO has shot itself in the foot by becoming so arcane and weird and bereft of any shred of pragmatism or broader interest. This leaves a big opening to be filled, sometimes by shady characters like Steinbaum.
I agree that Noah's active encouragement of Marshall actually strongly erodes my opinion of Noah. Most of the time Noah comes across as intellectually honest, even if all his conclusions are politically motivated. The support of Marshall reveals the intellectual honesty to be a facade.
He hasn't???? He's been in the think tank world for 5 years where his only expectation is to write. No classes to teach, no committees to serve on. Just write. And he produced a big fat zero.
He hasn’t been paid to write research until now. So judge him after a few years. I suspect this move will increase his work on antitrust and monopsony.
Would you say that the paper by Azar, Berry and Marinescu is better?
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3456277
I'm truly curious here. It seems more structural in its approach but still relies on pretty ad hoc (Hausman) instrument in the end of the day.
^ His methodology is pretty terrible and he clearly is interested in a particular conclusion.
On the other hand, you could say that mainstream structural IO has shot itself in the foot by becoming so arcane and weird and bereft of any shred of pragmatism or broader interest. This leaves a big opening to be filled, sometimes by shady characters like Steinbaum.
he's better in person.
On twitter, his thing is to be obnoxiously rude and believing that saying mean things is being smart and bold.
He is, and I say this with perfect sincerity, either dishonest in the extreme, or literally mentally challenged.
https://twitter.com/Econ_Marshall/status/1244420169746624513