Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 151c
Because Susan Athey and Victor Chernozhukov did not know what to do next in econemetrics.
Economist 73ed
YUP
Economist efaa
Particle physics
Economist 8f1c
ML has solved more and bigger problems than string theory, i.e. more than zero. and frankly, it also has more potential (AGI would dwarf any grand unified theory as a breakthrough)
Economist c561
Machine learning doesn’t help economics because economics doesn’t work
Econ like all social sciences is an art / superstructure factory
Economist 9958
Not worth the hype, not in economics anyways,
Because economics is an insular backwater.
So how come machine learning isn’t that popular in marketing departments.? It is.
Economist de57
Cavemen, machine learning is like fire. You can use it like a tool. Don't get too burned.
Economist f396
Remember "big data"? "Business intelligence"? Six Sigma? etc etc etc
I'm old enough to remember BRICs.
Economist 1af6
the ignorance in this thread is incredible.
The ignorance that is you.
Economist 2d00
wow sick burn bro!
the ignorance in this thread is incredible. The ignorance that is you.
Post <blockquote>Wow. So instead of paying a boiler-room full of $1/day employees in Bengali, we have crappy chat bots! Text scanning? Only the simplest techniques that have been around for decades are used for that. <blockquote>Text scanning is huge in many industries, as is image recognition, and what about those chatbots that save tons of money spent on phone operators? <blockquote>yet we still haven't seen it solved a single big question? </blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li