Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 151c
Because Susan Athey and Victor Chernozhukov did not know what to do next in econemetrics.
Economist 73ed
YUP
Economist efaa
Particle physics
Economist 8f1c
ML has solved more and bigger problems than string theory, i.e. more than zero. and frankly, it also has more potential (AGI would dwarf any grand unified theory as a breakthrough)
Economist c561
Machine learning doesn’t help economics because economics doesn’t work
Econ like all social sciences is an art / superstructure factory
Economist 9958
Not worth the hype, not in economics anyways,
Because economics is an insular backwater.
So how come machine learning isn’t that popular in marketing departments.? It is.
Economist de57
Cavemen, machine learning is like fire. You can use it like a tool. Don't get too burned.
Economist f396
Remember "big data"? "Business intelligence"? Six Sigma? etc etc etc
I'm old enough to remember BRICs.
Economist 1af6
the ignorance in this thread is incredible.
The ignorance that is you.
Economist 2d00
wow sick burn bro!
the ignorance in this thread is incredible. The ignorance that is you.
Post <blockquote><blockquote>Machine learning is all over online advertising. You may pooh pooh that, but online advertising is why Facebook and Google are worth well over a trillion dollars. </blockquote> Eg. you can give Facebook your existing customer list and advertise to people similar. That's machine learning. When economists do statistics, it's called econometrics, and when computer scientists do statistics, it's called machine learning. No good me all you want, but statistically driven, targeted advertising is a huge deal.</blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li