Big fraud going on…look at de Mol et al. 2020…fake p values. Not only referenced in the table but referenced in the manuscript itself. Definitely purposely faked.
Why isnt anyone talking about the scandal Journal of Business Venturing?
-
*they
I bet it's no fraud but honest incompetence. I guess the use SPSS and report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors for the unstandardized coefficients. I saw this a couple of times in bachelor's theses.
Perhaps, but that should be found out. There needs to be an investigation. It also could’ve been that the first author was under a lot of pressure to convert the RnR and cheated a bit. The first author is no longer in academia either.
-
I bet it's no fraud but honest incompetence. I guess the use SPSS and report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors for the unstandardized coefficients. I saw this a couple of times in bachelor's theses.
Could you explain this to me like I am 5, please?
-
I bet it's no fraud but honest incompetence. I guess the use SPSS and report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors for the unstandardized coefficients. I saw this a couple of times in bachelor's theses.
Could you explain this to me like I am 5, please?
Check the SPSS output table here:https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/output/regression-analysis/
In the table, you find the unstandardized coefficient + standard errors, the standardized coefficient without standard errors and the p-values. My students often report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors of the unstandardized coefficients and the p-values of unstandardized coefficients/standard errors. That explains why the t-values in the paper do not match with the p-values. -
I bet it's no fraud but honest incompetence. I guess the use SPSS and report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors for the unstandardized coefficients. I saw this a couple of times in bachelor's theses.
Could you explain this to me like I am 5, please?
Check the SPSS output table here:https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/output/regression-analysis/
In the table, you find the unstandardized coefficient + standard errors, the standardized coefficient without standard errors and the p-values. My students often report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors of the unstandardized coefficients and the p-values of unstandardized coefficients/standard errors. That explains why the t-values in the paper do not match with the p-values.There’s no evidence that is what happened. Fraud is also a possibility. As of now there are just many tables where the standard errors and p values dont make sense. The p values are also printed in the manuscript itself when describing the hypothesis testing.
-
I bet it's no fraud but honest incompetence. I guess the use SPSS and report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors for the unstandardized coefficients. I saw this a couple of times in bachelor's theses.
Could you explain this to me like I am 5, please?
Check the SPSS output table here:https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/output/regression-analysis/
In the table, you find the unstandardized coefficient + standard errors, the standardized coefficient without standard errors and the p-values. My students often report the standardized coefficient with the standard errors of the unstandardized coefficients and the p-values of unstandardized coefficients/standard errors. That explains why the t-values in the paper do not match with the p-values.There’s no evidence that is what happened. Fraud is also a possibility. As of now there are just many tables where the standard errors and p values dont make sense. The p values are also printed in the manuscript itself when describing the hypothesis testing.
Sure. I just said that I would bet that this is the explanation.