Not a good look. Explain yourselves!
Whyte mails lie to universities about their r@ce
-
best response to widespread discrimination against them
Universities that take race into account disproportionately favor white men at the expense of Asians, with no bump for blacks and a slight bump for Latinos; compared to universities that can’t (eg Cal). Affirmative action is a smoke screen to let in under qualified Chad’s so that high quality women keep applying.
-
best response to widespread discrimination against them
Universities that take race into account disproportionately favor white men at the expense of Asians, with no bump for blacks and a slight bump for Latinos; compared to universities that can’t (eg Cal). Affirmative action is a smoke screen to let in under qualified Chad’s so that high quality women keep applying.
lol is this a joke? No bump for blacks?
You can get into an ivy with a very modest SAT score if you’re black. A good SAT will get you a free ride at every ivy.
-
best response to widespread discrimination against them
l0l colleges are discriminating in favor of males
Uh-huh, suuuure. That’s why Harvard has a “Female High Scorer” category who don’t score as high as males, right?
"The document shows that 12,022 women and 17,669 men had scores 1380 or higher. An additional 3,749 women received scores between 1360 and 1370, labeled as “Female High Scorers.”"
-
best response to widespread discrimination against them
l0l colleges are discriminating in favor of males
Uh-huh, suuuure. That’s why Harvard has a “Female High Scorer” category who don’t score as high as males, right?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/arcidiacono-nails-harvard-again-for-hiding-preferences-with-fake-black-admits
"The document shows that 12,022 women and 17,669 men had scores 1380 or higher. An additional 3,749 women received scores between 1360 and 1370, labeled as “Female High Scorers.”"Cope maletard
"Many colleges have sought to remedy that imbalance by admitting more men, especially among undergraduates, forcing schools to reach deeper into the applicant pool. In the survey released last week by Inside Higher Ed, a web site that focuses on education news, 11 percent of admissions directors said they admit male applicants with below average test scores and grades. Only 3 percent of the 462 surveyed said they admit female applicants with below average credentials.
At public 4-year colleges the number is even higher. Almost one-in-five 18 percent - are so hungry for male students admissions directors report admitting men with lower academic credentials, according to the survey."
"Just how much preference was Brigham Young giving to men? The suggestion that BYU was doing something scandalous doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. The index that the university used until 2015 had 100 possible points -- 76 of those points were based on GPA and ACT scores alone. The remaining 24 points gave students credit for a variety of factors ranging from being an active Mormon to extracurricular activities to taking Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate courses to residing in Alaska or east of Colorado. Being male added one point. The fact that no woman could score higher than 99 sends its own odd message, but I think the number of students admitted to BYU purely because they were male is probably extremely small."
-
but at HRM, the affirmative action goes the other day. Explain that lib.
best response to widespread discrimination against them
l0l colleges are discriminating in favor of males
Uh-huh, suuuure. That’s why Harvard has a “Female High Scorer” category who don’t score as high as males, right?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/arcidiacono-nails-harvard-again-for-hiding-preferences-with-fake-black-admits
"The document shows that 12,022 women and 17,669 men had scores 1380 or higher. An additional 3,749 women received scores between 1360 and 1370, labeled as “Female High Scorers.”"Cope maletard
"Many colleges have sought to remedy that imbalance by admitting more men, especially among undergraduates, forcing schools to reach deeper into the applicant pool. In the survey released last week by Inside Higher Ed, a web site that focuses on education news, 11 percent of admissions directors said they admit male applicants with below average test scores and grades. Only 3 percent of the 462 surveyed said they admit female applicants with below average credentials.
At public 4-year colleges the number is even higher. Almost one-in-five 18 percent - are so hungry for male students admissions directors report admitting men with lower academic credentials, according to the survey."
"Just how much preference was Brigham Young giving to men? The suggestion that BYU was doing something scandalous doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. The index that the university used until 2015 had 100 possible points -- 76 of those points were based on GPA and ACT scores alone. The remaining 24 points gave students credit for a variety of factors ranging from being an active Mormon to extracurricular activities to taking Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate courses to residing in Alaska or east of Colorado. Being male added one point. The fact that no woman could score higher than 99 sends its own odd message, but I think the number of students admitted to BYU purely because they were male is probably extremely small." -
No look at the actual percentages at places like UNC versus Cal. Cal’s Black population is more representative of the state’s than UNC. Same with Latinos. You know what goes down for UNC? Over representation of Asians
best response to widespread discrimination against them
Universities that take race into account disproportionately favor white men at the expense of Asians, with no bump for blacks and a slight bump for Latinos; compared to universities that can’t (eg Cal). Affirmative action is a smoke screen to let in under qualified Chad’s so that high quality women keep applying.
lol is this a joke? No bump for blacks?
You can get into an ivy with a very modest SAT score if you’re black. A good SAT will get you a free ride at every ivy. -
I don’t believe this survey. There’s no way 48% of white males are lying about their race and pretending to be Native Americans on their college applications. The number of applications from “Natives” would skyrocket if that were true and we don’t see that in the data.
-
best response to widespread discrimination against them
Universities that take race into account disproportionately favor white men at the expense of Asians, with no bump for blacks and a slight bump for Latinos; compared to universities that can’t (eg Cal). Affirmative action is a smoke screen to let in under qualified Chad’s so that high quality women keep applying.
It’s amazing how divorced from reality your take is
-
"34 percent of white Americans who applied to colleges or universities admit to lying about being a racial minority on their application. The most common lie (by 48 percent of those who lied) was to be a Native American. White men were three times as likely as white women to lie (48 percent to 16 percent)."
Rational response to nonsense admissions criteria.