Should that second chance be given to AY?
He learned the lesson. Can he get a second chance?
"Will the real specification please stand up?" discredits accounting paper
-
Reminder that 29c1 is a troll.
Any update?
Relax, if they move you'll know at the start of the year. What's the obsession with these dockheads?
29C1 has been obsessed for 7 months. Constantly posting about them moving. Then trolling and saying leave them alone. Don’t feed the troll.
But to be fair, it's a pretty funny troll because Stephen Karolyi did the same fraud twice at TAR+RFS, so "can he get a second chance" really means "can he get a third chance."
-
It seems like YOU are trolling. You would give your left arm to have 10% of the resume of any of these 10 references. Who are you kidding? I bet you don’t even have a single good published paper. If you spent a fraction of time you spent here on your papers, you would have a nicer future as opposed to living in your mama’s basement.
They don’t seem very reputable anymore. No way to defend this.
Enough trolling.The guy’s resume has 10 names listed as references. All reputable scholars. I think their word means more than a crazy dchmuck posting here day and night.
-
You seem pretty convinced that the only thing to being a scholar is being a prestige who-oar
It seems like YOU are trolling. You would give your left arm to have 10% of the resume of any of these 10 references. Who are you kidding? I bet you don’t even have a single good published paper. If you spent a fraction of time you spent here on your papers, you would have a nicer future as opposed to living in your mama’s basement.
They don’t seem very reputable anymore. No way to defend this.
Enough trolling.The guy’s resume has 10 names listed as references. All reputable scholars. I think their word means more than a crazy dchmuck posting here day and night.
-
Irrelevant.
You are fixated on this issue for too long. Let go.You seem pretty convinced that the only thing to being a scholar is being a prestige who-oar
It seems like YOU are trolling. You would give your left arm to have 10% of the resume of any of these 10 references. Who are you kidding? I bet you don’t even have a single good published paper. If you spent a fraction of time you spent here on your papers, you would have a nicer future as opposed to living in your mama’s basement.
They don’t seem very reputable anymore. No way to defend this.
Enough trolling.The guy’s resume has 10 names listed as references. All reputable scholars. I think their word means more than a crazy dchmuck posting here day and night.
-
They keep publishing at a very high rate.
They don’t seem very reputable anymore. No way to defend this.
Enough trolling.The guy’s resume has 10 names listed as references. All reputable scholars. I think their word means more than a crazy dchmuck posting here day and night.
-
How is the scummy white stuff pouring out of your various facial fissures irrelevant
You are inhaling sausage at the same time you're pretending to wisdom and impartiality
You're the worst kind of species. A wannabe club member who would who-oar itself for any priceIrrelevant.
You are fixated on this issue for too long. Let go.You seem pretty convinced that the only thing to being a scholar is being a prestige who-oar
-
I’m doing just fine, thanks. I’ve got plenty of my own houses also. Just toddle off, little one.
It seems like YOU are trolling. You would give your left arm to have 10% of the resume of any of these 10 references. Who are you kidding? I bet you don’t even have a single good published paper. If you spent a fraction of time you spent here on your papers, you would have a nicer future as opposed to living in your mama’s basement.
They don’t seem very reputable anymore. No way to defend this.
Enough trolling.The guy’s resume has 10 names listed as references. All reputable scholars. I think their word means more than a crazy dchmuck posting here day and night.
-
You are correct. Your attempts at muddying the waters are all irrelevant. What's relevant is that when TAR asked Stephen Karolyi and Andrew Bird to provide the original data and code to reproduce their findings, they said their laptop died and nothing was ever backed up.
What's also relevant is that for Karolyi, it's easier to get 10+ references than to simply post the replication kit that he claims exonerates him. Who would have thought that's how social science works?
Irrelevant.
-
Which part of this drama is hard to understand in the agency framework?
The part where there's no consequences to being found out. If you detect less than 100% of frauds you need to overpunish those you do catch, not give them tenure at a formerly top business school.