张把上面提到他的人的全家女性都强奸遍了
"Will the real specification please stand up?" discredits accounting paper
-
both of them were on track for tenure at CMU, a world class research university. One of them is now at a third tier liberal arts college, the other at a third tier government agency. In academic terms, that's a brutal punishment - and it's enough. The legal system allows for perpetrators to re-enter society after serving their punishment. So should the academic system for AB and SK. Let it go.
-
both of them were on track for tenure at CMU, a world class research university. One of them is now at a third tier liberal arts college, the other at a third tier government agency. In academic terms, that's a brutal punishment - and it's enough. The legal system allows for perpetrators to re-enter society after serving their punishment. So should the academic system for AB and SK. Let it go.
Justice somewhat prevailed. However there are still many frauds in this profession that operate undetected. There should be some incentive system for people to replicate work. For maximum efficiency, target the low skill p-hacker types who only know how to run simple FE panel regressions.
-
both of them were on track for tenure at CMU, a world class research university. One of them is now at a third tier liberal arts college, the other at a third tier government agency. In academic terms, that's a brutal punishment - and it's enough. The legal system allows for perpetrators to re-enter society after serving their punishment. So should the academic system for AB and SK. Let it go.
So James Hunton should be allowed to re-enter the academic system according to you?
-
I did not - I asked for nuance.
Hunton straight up made up primary data, not just once, but dozens of times in effectively his entire body of work. This is substantial worse in both quality (swindling about a robustness test method SK/Ab) and quantity (1 paper SK/AB with tons of other clean contributions).
Just like in the criminal justice system punishment increases with the crime, it should in academia. That is also the case in the case of white color crimes. You do something shady, you lose your job and have to move down in terms of quality of school. If you commit massive fraud, you are barred to work in the financial industry for life. Worst case, jail.
I am not religious, but there is something to be said about he who has never looked at a p value of 6% and thought about trying a different specification to get those two stars shall throw the first rock.
both of them were on track for tenure at CMU, a world class research university. One of them is now at a third tier liberal arts college, the other at a third tier government agency. In academic terms, that's a brutal punishment - and it's enough. The legal system allows for perpetrators to re-enter society after serving their punishment. So should the academic system for AB and SK. Let it go.
So James Hunton should be allowed to re-enter the academic system according to you?
-
So what? The legal system allows for perpetrators to re-enter society after serving their punishment. So should the academic system for James Hunton. Let it go.
Hunton straight up made up primary data, not just once, but dozens of times in effectively his entire body of work.
-
Yes, big respect to Alex Young and Wei Wei. And do not forget their contribution was not just revealing SKAB's fraud but indeed to show that Appel Gormley Keim's famous JFE "Passive Investors, Not Passive Owners" paper is nonsense and does not pass a simple balance test.