Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist be3a
Nice to revisit this.
Economist 4c47
What does Karl think?
Bum p
Great post
Economist 03d9
Again?
Economist 98c8
Nice to revisit this classic thread.
Economist d34f
Related to “resigning as coauthor on paper that could be published”
Economist a964
Should I withdraw all my published theory papers? Is this advisable these days?
Economist cddf
Voted this up several times. Takes a lot of b@lls to buck convention.
Economist 9b1a
Great thread. Good old days.
Economist 9375
The one and only legend.
Economist 69b6
Nice to revisit this thread.
Economist 8317
Ode to Bob Kirk is the true legendary post on EJMR.
The one and only legend. Ode to Bob Kirk is the true legendary post on EJMR.
Bob King. I shouldn't start drinking in the early afternoon.
Post <blockquote><blockquote>If the paper is good, it will get lots of attention anyway (citations). True, you probably draw more attention quicker in top journals, but the Nobel committee looks a quality :-)</blockquote> That's what I tried to say before. A paper published in, say, JME will get enough attention, and you should be happy about that even though it's AER-level paper. See, for example, the Calvo (1983) paper and the Hansen (1985). See also the paper of Edmund Phelps that was published in The Swedish Journal of Economics, but still considered as an important paper in literature. Learn from this experience and move on. You have one bird in hand...</blockquote>
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li